首页> 外文OA文献 >Pleiotropic effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. high dose simvastatin
【2h】

Pleiotropic effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs. high dose simvastatin

机译:依泽替米贝/辛伐他汀与高剂量辛伐他汀的多效性作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: In the setting of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not known if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between combined ezetimibe/simvastatin and high-dose simvastatin alone. Objective: We sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) with simvastatin 80 mg (S80). Methods and results: CAD patients (n = 83, 63 +/- 9 years, 57% men) receiving S20, were randomly allocated to receive E10/S20 or S80, for 6 weeks. Lipids, inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, soluble CD40 ligand and oxidized LDL), and platelet aggregation (platelet function analyzer [PFA]-100) changes were determined. Baseline lipids, inflammatory markers and PFA-100 were similar between groups. After treatment, E10/S20 and S80 patients presented, respectively: (1) similar reduction in LDL-C (29 +/- 13% vs. 28 +/- 30%, p = 0.46), apo-B (18 +/- 17% vs. 22 +/- 15%, p = 0.22) and oxidized LDL (15 +/- 33% vs. 18 +/- 47%, p = 0.30); (2) no changes in inflammatory markers; and, (3) a higher increase of the PFA-100 with E10/S20 than with S80 (27 +/- 43% vs. 8 +/- 33%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: These data suggest that among stable CAD patients treated with S20, (1) both E10/S20 and S80 were equally effective in further reducing LDL-C; (2) neither treatment had any further significant anti-inflammatory effects; and (3) E10/S20 was more effective than S80 in inhibiting platelet aggregation. Thus, despite similar lipid lowering and doses 4x less of simvastatin, E10/S20 induced a greater platelet inhibitory effect than S80. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:在稳定的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的情况下,尚不清楚依泽替米贝/辛伐他汀联合用药和单独的大剂量辛伐他汀之间胆固醇降低的多效性作用是否不同。目的:我们试图比较ezetimibe 10 mg /辛伐他汀20 mg(E10 / S20)和simvastatin 80 mg(S80)的抗炎和抗血小板作用。方法和结果:接受S20治疗的CAD患者(n = 83、63 +/- 9岁,男性占57%)被随机分配接受E10 / S20或S80治疗,持续6周。测定脂质,炎性标记(C反应蛋白,白介素6,单核细胞趋化蛋白1,可溶性CD40配体和氧化的LDL)和血小板聚集(血小板功能分析仪[PFA] -100)的变化。两组之间的基线脂质,炎症标记和PFA-100相似。治疗后,E10 / S20和S80患者分别出现:(1)LDL-C的相似减少(29 +/- 13%比28 +/- 30%,p = 0.46),载脂蛋白B(18 + / -17%对22 +/- 15%,p = 0.22)和氧化的LDL(15 +/- 33%对18 +/- 47%,p = 0.30); (2)炎症标志物无变化; (3)与S80相比,E10 / S20的PFA-100增加幅度更高(27 +/- 43%对8 +/- 33%,p = 0.02)。结论:这些数据表明,在接受S20治疗的稳定的CAD患者中,(1)E10 / S20和S80在降低LDL-C方面均有效。 (2)两种治疗方法均无进一步明显的抗炎作用; (3)E10 / S20在抑制血小板聚集方面比S80更有效。因此,尽管类似的脂质降低和辛伐他汀剂量减少了4倍,E10 / S20仍比S80诱导了更大的血小板抑制作用。 (C)2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号